Roles, Signers, Integrations
Protected.
$3.31B was stolen last year — not through code bugs, but compromised keys, weak multisig setups, and phished signers. We expose those hidden single points of failure in any on-chain infrastructure.
01 / The Gap
Fill the security gaps between code and operations.
Code bugsEconomic exploitsIntegration bugsUpgrades correctness
LayerContracts
Audit
Audit
Smart-contract auditors built strong fundamentals around static code analysis, formal verification, and economic invariant review. But it covers only 20% of actual risk — ±80% of DeFi theft comes from infrastructure and operational failures.
Ownership posture3rd-party setup securityHidden single points of failure
The GlueSTABILYTICS
The majority of recent hacks happened in neither layer.
Stabilytics exists to close this gap — the glue between static code review and traditional operational security.
Keys managementAccess controlTreasury operationsTech dependencies
LayerOpSec
Audit
Audit
OpSec auditors bring decades of battle-tested traditional security discipline — ISO 27001, SOC 2, NIST, key ceremonies, IAM hardening, supply-chain hygiene. They make sure the people, infrastructure, and processes around the code follow institutional security standards.
02 / The Stakes
Why this matters — right now.
60+On-chain hacks · 2026 YTD
29 in April alone — and the head of an iceberg.Most weren't pure code bugs.
North Korea doesn't hack code. They hack people. Your smart-contract audit has never tested for that. We do.
03 / Outcomes
What you walk away with.
Full posture map of your live deployment
Every privileged role, signer, and 3rd-party integration — classified, risk-scored, and pinned to exact on-chain addresses. No vague categories.
Prioritized fix plan your team can ship
Specific addresses, thresholds, config changes, and timelock deltas — ranked by impact so the highest-risk changes ship first.
A verifiable report you can publish
PDF + permanent web URL. Structured to be forwarded to investors, LPs, partners, and exchanges — no redaction needed.
04 / Method
Human-accountable. Peer-reviewed.
We use AI, scanners, and modern tooling to find candidates fast — but a human engineer owns every finding and severity call, and every Critical and High is independently peer-reviewed by a second engineer before the report reaches you.
05 / Engagement
How it works.
01ScopeContracts, roles, integrations
02AnalyzeTooling + manual review
03Fix findingsWith your team
04ReportPDF + URL
06 / Coverage
How we cover it — three pillars.
Roles & Power Distribution
- Every privileged role on every contract
- EOAs vs. multisigs vs. timelocks, mapped
- Concentration risk scored per role
If any single key holds disproportionate power, you'll know.
Signer Trust Analysis
- Threshold logic vs. real-world coercion risk
- Signer overlap across orgs and chains
- Phishing, deepfake, and bribery vectors
If your multisig design has a soft target, you'll know.
Integration Verification
- Bridges, oracles, DeFi — checked
- Default configs vs. hardened configs
- Upstream supply-chain exposure
If your defaults are dangerous, you'll know.
Protection
Find every weak link before they do.
LZCheck surfaces ownership and DVN risks on-chain. Full Stabilytics coverage maps every social engineering vector and hidden single point of failure across your entire project.